$1.8 Million Settlement Reached in Criminal Background Check Case
3 min read
Written By
Kelly Uebel
Published
Nov 05, 2020
In early September, a $1.8 million settlement was announced in a case over a nationwide retailer’s criminal background check policies.
We blogged about this case back in September 2019 which involved numerous allegations under several areas of law:
(i) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the New York City Human Rights Law (which incorporates Article 23-A of the NY state Correction Law and the NYC Fair Chance Act);
(ii) the NYC Fair Chance Act and
(iii) the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
In particular, the lawsuit claimed the employer’s criminal history policies and practices had a disparate impact on black and Latino job applicants and employees with no tie to being job-related or consistent with business necessity (racial and/or national origin discrimination). Additionally, the employer allegedly asked applicants in NYC to authorize a background check prior to extending a conditional offer. Finally, the employer allegedly failed to follow the FCRA adverse action process.
As part of the monetary settlement, the employer also agreed to reform its criminal background check policies.
In early September, a $1.8 million settlement was announced in a case over a nationwide retailer’s criminal background check policies.
We blogged about this case back in September 2019 which involved numerous allegations under several areas of law:
(i) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the New York City Human Rights Law (which incorporates Article 23-A of the NY state Correction Law and the NYC Fair Chance Act);
(ii) the NYC Fair Chance Act and
(iii) the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
In particular, the lawsuit claimed the employer’s criminal history policies and practices had a disparate impact on black and Latino job applicants and employees with no tie to being job-related or consistent with business necessity (racial and/or national origin discrimination). Additionally, the employer allegedly asked applicants in NYC to authorize a background check prior to extending a conditional offer. Finally, the employer allegedly failed to follow the FCRA adverse action process.
As part of the monetary settlement, the employer also agreed to reform its criminal background check policies.
In early September, a $1.8 million settlement was announced in a case over a nationwide retailer’s criminal background check policies.
We blogged about this case back in September 2019 which involved numerous allegations under several areas of law:
(i) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the New York City Human Rights Law (which incorporates Article 23-A of the NY state Correction Law and the NYC Fair Chance Act);
(ii) the NYC Fair Chance Act and
(iii) the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
In particular, the lawsuit claimed the employer’s criminal history policies and practices had a disparate impact on black and Latino job applicants and employees with no tie to being job-related or consistent with business necessity (racial and/or national origin discrimination). Additionally, the employer allegedly asked applicants in NYC to authorize a background check prior to extending a conditional offer. Finally, the employer allegedly failed to follow the FCRA adverse action process.
As part of the monetary settlement, the employer also agreed to reform its criminal background check policies.
You might also like
EEOC Compliance Update: Arrest and Conviction Records Guidance Rescinded
The EEOC's decision to rescind its 2012 criminal records guidance marks a notable policy shift, but employers still need to understand what has changed and what compliance obligations remain.
5 Drug Screening Questions HR Leaders Should Revisit
If you want to build an effective drug and health screening program, start by asking these five questions.
Keeping Up with Compliance: Recent FCRA Litigation Trends Employers Need to Watch
We cover recent FCRA cases shaping the employment background screening landscape and highlight emerging legal trends employers should have on their radar.