Employer Settles Disclosure, Adverse Action Lawsuit
1 min read
Written By
Kelly Uebel
Published
Sep 13, 2022

An employer recently entered into a settlement over claims it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)— namely, the disclosure, authorization and adverse action requirements. The settlement fund is $60,500, while the plaintiff’s attorneys will receive $236,500.00 (paid by the employer).
The Case
The case began in September 2019, when a class action complaint was filed against the employer. The plaintiff, a job applicant, alleged the employer obtained and used consumer reports (i.e., background screens) for employment purposes without complying with the FCRA.
This case in particular is interesting as the employer used a private security firm to conduct the background checks. The employer then argued that the private security firm was not a consumer reporting agency (CRA) and thus the FCRA did not apply.
The Takeaway
Drawing the line between an entity operating as a CRA versus not operating as a CRA is a difficult one. Employers that use private security firms, private investigators or other websites that purport to operate outside of the FCRA are encouraged to discuss this practice with qualified legal counsel as it can have significant ramifications.
You might also like

EEOC Compliance Update: Arrest and Conviction Records Guidance Rescinded
The EEOC's decision to rescind its 2012 criminal records guidance marks a notable policy shift, but employers still need to understand what has changed and what compliance obligations remain.

5 Drug Screening Questions HR Leaders Should Revisit
If you want to build an effective drug and health screening program, start by asking these five questions.

Keeping Up with Compliance: Recent FCRA Litigation Trends Employers Need to Watch
We cover recent FCRA cases shaping the employment background screening landscape and highlight emerging legal trends employers should have on their radar.