Employer Settles Disclosure, Adverse Action Lawsuit
1 min read
Written By
Kelly Uebel
Published
Sep 13, 2022

An employer recently entered into a settlement over claims it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)— namely, the disclosure, authorization and adverse action requirements. The settlement fund is $60,500, while the plaintiff’s attorneys will receive $236,500.00 (paid by the employer).
The Case
The case began in September 2019, when a class action complaint was filed against the employer. The plaintiff, a job applicant, alleged the employer obtained and used consumer reports (i.e., background screens) for employment purposes without complying with the FCRA.
This case in particular is interesting as the employer used a private security firm to conduct the background checks. The employer then argued that the private security firm was not a consumer reporting agency (CRA) and thus the FCRA did not apply.
The Takeaway
Drawing the line between an entity operating as a CRA versus not operating as a CRA is a difficult one. Employers that use private security firms, private investigators or other websites that purport to operate outside of the FCRA are encouraged to discuss this practice with qualified legal counsel as it can have significant ramifications.
You might also like

5 Golden Rules for Property Operators
The following five principles reflect what effective, modern tenant screening looks like today and how property teams can protect their assets while meeting evolving expectations.

3 Drug Screening Assumptions Employers Need to Revisit
During our recent webinar, "Can You Spot the Lie? The Employer's Drug Testing Reality Check," three themes stood out as particularly important for employers evaluating or updating their drug testing programs.

Social Media Screening: Here's What Employers Need to Know
Social media screening is gaining traction in hiring, but understanding the facts behind the process is key to making informed, compliant decisions.