California Civil Rights Department Announces $100k Settlement with Employer
2 min read
Written By
Kelly Uebel
Published
May 29, 2025

On April 3, the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) announced a $100,000 settlement with a nationwide trucking company over allegations the company violated the state’s Fair Chance Act.
The CRD’s investigation began following receipt of a job applicant’s complaint that they were rejected based on their criminal history information. As alleged, the applicant received a conditional offer for a senior leadership position but had that offer withdrawn without an individualized assessment being performed. The complaint further alleged the employer failed to consider factors such as the nature and gravity of the offense, time passed since the offense occurred, and how the offense related to the position being sought.
In addition to the monetary settlement, the employer agreed to take the following actions:
- Provide training on the Fair Chance Act to all employees involved in the hiring process or other employment decisions. The training must be for at least two hours on an annual basis. Copies of the training materials must be provided to the CRD for review.
- Conduct a review of the company’s policies to ensure they comply with the Fair Chance Act, including by making sure convictions older than seven years are not considered.
- Report any changes in policies to CRD within 45 days.
It’s important to note the employer did not admit liability as part of this settlement.
It is clear the CRD is actively pursuing enforcement of the Fair Chance Act’s requirements. We recommend employers hiring in California review the Fair Chance Act, along with their policies, procedures and employee training, in conjunction with qualified legal counsel.
You might also like

Navigating the New Era of Tenant Screening: What Landlords Need to Know
Tenant screening is rapidly changing due to technological innovation, shifting market demands, and evolving regulations. Experts emphasize the growing importance of accuracy, coverage, and compliance in screening and selecting reliable tenants.

Oregon Impacts Employer Collection of Age-Related Information
Effective September 28, 2025, Oregon’s discrimination law is amended to make it an unlawful employment practice for an employer, prospective employer or employment agency, to collect age, date of birth, or attendance or graduation dates at any educational institution. (HB 3187).

Allentown, Pennsylvania Enacts New Antidiscrimination Ordinance
Allentown, Pennsylvania recently repealed and then enacted a new antidiscrimination ordinance via Ordinance No. 16140. The new law is in effect as of June 14, 2025 and applies to any employer with one or more employees.