$1.8 Million Settlement Reached in Criminal Background Check Case
3 min read
Written By
Kelly Uebel
Published
Nov 05, 2020

In early September, a $1.8 million settlement was announced in a case over a nationwide retailer’s criminal background check policies.
We blogged about this case back in September 2019 which involved numerous allegations under several areas of law:
(i) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the New York City Human Rights Law (which incorporates Article 23-A of the NY state Correction Law and the NYC Fair Chance Act);
(ii) the NYC Fair Chance Act and
(iii) the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
In particular, the lawsuit claimed the employer’s criminal history policies and practices had a disparate impact on black and Latino job applicants and employees with no tie to being job-related or consistent with business necessity (racial and/or national origin discrimination). Additionally, the employer allegedly asked applicants in NYC to authorize a background check prior to extending a conditional offer. Finally, the employer allegedly failed to follow the FCRA adverse action process.
As part of the monetary settlement, the employer also agreed to reform its criminal background check policies.
In early September, a $1.8 million settlement was announced in a case over a nationwide retailer’s criminal background check policies.
We blogged about this case back in September 2019 which involved numerous allegations under several areas of law:
(i) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the New York City Human Rights Law (which incorporates Article 23-A of the NY state Correction Law and the NYC Fair Chance Act);
(ii) the NYC Fair Chance Act and
(iii) the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
In particular, the lawsuit claimed the employer’s criminal history policies and practices had a disparate impact on black and Latino job applicants and employees with no tie to being job-related or consistent with business necessity (racial and/or national origin discrimination). Additionally, the employer allegedly asked applicants in NYC to authorize a background check prior to extending a conditional offer. Finally, the employer allegedly failed to follow the FCRA adverse action process.
As part of the monetary settlement, the employer also agreed to reform its criminal background check policies.
In early September, a $1.8 million settlement was announced in a case over a nationwide retailer’s criminal background check policies.
We blogged about this case back in September 2019 which involved numerous allegations under several areas of law:
(i) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the New York City Human Rights Law (which incorporates Article 23-A of the NY state Correction Law and the NYC Fair Chance Act);
(ii) the NYC Fair Chance Act and
(iii) the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
In particular, the lawsuit claimed the employer’s criminal history policies and practices had a disparate impact on black and Latino job applicants and employees with no tie to being job-related or consistent with business necessity (racial and/or national origin discrimination). Additionally, the employer allegedly asked applicants in NYC to authorize a background check prior to extending a conditional offer. Finally, the employer allegedly failed to follow the FCRA adverse action process.
As part of the monetary settlement, the employer also agreed to reform its criminal background check policies.
You might also like

Philadelphia Amends Fair Chance Law
Philadelphia’s mayor signed amendments to the city’s Fair Criminal Record Screening Standards Ordinance (FCRSSO) into law on October 8th.

Cruise Line Company Settles Fair Credit Reporting Act Adverse Action Claims
A cruise line company recently settled claims that it violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).

Department of Transportation Seeks to Add Fentanyl to Drug Testing Panel
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) proposed a rule that aims to add fentanyl to the DOT’s drug testing panel.