$1.8 Million Settlement Reached in Criminal Background Check Case
3 min read
Written By
Kelly Uebel
Published
Nov 05, 2020

In early September, a $1.8 million settlement was announced in a case over a nationwide retailer’s criminal background check policies.
We blogged about this case back in September 2019 which involved numerous allegations under several areas of law:
(i) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the New York City Human Rights Law (which incorporates Article 23-A of the NY state Correction Law and the NYC Fair Chance Act);
(ii) the NYC Fair Chance Act and
(iii) the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
In particular, the lawsuit claimed the employer’s criminal history policies and practices had a disparate impact on black and Latino job applicants and employees with no tie to being job-related or consistent with business necessity (racial and/or national origin discrimination). Additionally, the employer allegedly asked applicants in NYC to authorize a background check prior to extending a conditional offer. Finally, the employer allegedly failed to follow the FCRA adverse action process.
As part of the monetary settlement, the employer also agreed to reform its criminal background check policies.
In early September, a $1.8 million settlement was announced in a case over a nationwide retailer’s criminal background check policies.
We blogged about this case back in September 2019 which involved numerous allegations under several areas of law:
(i) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the New York City Human Rights Law (which incorporates Article 23-A of the NY state Correction Law and the NYC Fair Chance Act);
(ii) the NYC Fair Chance Act and
(iii) the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
In particular, the lawsuit claimed the employer’s criminal history policies and practices had a disparate impact on black and Latino job applicants and employees with no tie to being job-related or consistent with business necessity (racial and/or national origin discrimination). Additionally, the employer allegedly asked applicants in NYC to authorize a background check prior to extending a conditional offer. Finally, the employer allegedly failed to follow the FCRA adverse action process.
As part of the monetary settlement, the employer also agreed to reform its criminal background check policies.
In early September, a $1.8 million settlement was announced in a case over a nationwide retailer’s criminal background check policies.
We blogged about this case back in September 2019 which involved numerous allegations under several areas of law:
(i) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the New York City Human Rights Law (which incorporates Article 23-A of the NY state Correction Law and the NYC Fair Chance Act);
(ii) the NYC Fair Chance Act and
(iii) the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).
In particular, the lawsuit claimed the employer’s criminal history policies and practices had a disparate impact on black and Latino job applicants and employees with no tie to being job-related or consistent with business necessity (racial and/or national origin discrimination). Additionally, the employer allegedly asked applicants in NYC to authorize a background check prior to extending a conditional offer. Finally, the employer allegedly failed to follow the FCRA adverse action process.
As part of the monetary settlement, the employer also agreed to reform its criminal background check policies.
You might also like

What’s New in HR Compliance? Highlights from Our Latest Webinar
In Asurint’s final compliance webinar of 2025, General Counsel, Kelly Uebel, breaks down the most impactful changes HR professionals need to know heading into 2026.

3 Drug Testing Trends Transportation Fleets Can’t Ignore
With the surge of fentanyl positivity rates, here are three trends every transportation company should be aware of when it comes to random drug testing.

Chester County, PA Enacts Antidiscrimination Ordinance
Starting December 23, 2025, Chester County, Pennsylvania will have a new antidiscrimination ordinance in place impacting employers.